If I get around to it, I’ll probably just switch those to publish to GitHub’s container repository.
]]>Being the out-of-box default certainly doesn’t hurt when it comes to getting people who don’t want the hassle to just accept your offer rather than trying to self host or doing a lot of shopping around; but that advantage dries up fast if you push the price into the range where comparison shopping becomes more or less mandatory; or impose limits on things like storage and compute time that make using your EZ-cloud tools more frustrating than convenient.
Is there something important that they’ve kept away from the apache-licensed or directly-dependent-on-native-linux-features aspects of Docker that is genuinely arduous to reproduce and provides a reason to pay their rather optimistic prices for otherwise deeply commodified cloud storage and CPU time; or is this just a deeply optimistic move on their part?
]]>